India  

Why Supreme Court's nine-judge bench needs to interpret Article 39(b)

IndiaTimes Tuesday, 23 April 2024 ()
On Tuesday, a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court initiated proceedings to interpret Article 39(b) of the Constitution. This aims to clarify whether this directive principle of state policy permits the government to manage and redistribute privately owned properties under the pretext of "material resources of the community" for the broader public welfare.
0
shares
ShareTweetSavePostSend
 

💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Supreme court Supreme court Highest court in a jurisdiction

SC allows Patanjali to file contempt plea against IMA chief

Supreme Court allows filing a contempt application against IMA chief for disparaging remarks. Mukul Rohatgi warns of serious consequences for IMA president's..
IndiaTimes

Sandeshkhali case: Bengal govt moves SC against HC order directing CBI probe

West Bengal moves Supreme Court against CBI probe order in Sandeshkhali. ED raids linked to Mallick in ration scam. Sheikh, key conspirator, in custody. CBI..
IndiaTimes
Sumption: Rwanda Bill breaches two international treaties [Video]

Sumption: Rwanda Bill breaches two international treaties

Former justice of the Supreme Court, Lord Sumption, has said the government's Rwanda Bill breaches two international treaties which maintain courts challenges cannot be blocked. Report by Alibhaiz. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/itn and follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/itn

Credit: ODN    Duration: 01:09Published
Alabama Governor Signs IVF Protection Bill [Video]

Alabama Governor Signs IVF Protection Bill

Alabama Governor Signs, IVF Protection Bill . On March 6, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed legislation aimed at protecting in vitro fertilization patients and providers from legal liability. CNN reports that some clinics are ready to lift a hold on certain IVF services as early as this week. . The Alabama bill comes after an unprecedented state Supreme Court ruling cast the future of IVF care into doubt. The Supreme Court case reportedly stemmed from the accidental destruction of frozen embryos at a fertility clinic. The state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are human beings, meaning that those who destroy them could be held liable for wrongful death. The latest bill signed into law by the governor aims to provide both civil and criminal immunity to providers and patients in the case of embryos being damaged or destroyed. However, the fertility clinics say that the new law doesn't address the core issue and fails to provide the legal protection necessary to resume care. The law does not nullify the Supreme Court’s analysis that says the law ought to treat embryos just like people, Katherine Kraschel, assistant professor at Northeastern University School of Law, via CNN. CNN reports that experts have warned that the latest bill could also insulate providers from standard medical malpractice claims. The governor stressed that the new law is meant to be a "short-term measure" and reassured that "there will be more work to come" on ensuring IVF protections.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published

You Might Like


Related videos from verified sources

Protecting the Supreme Court from a Progressive Takeover | Roman Buhler, KeepNine.org [Video]

Protecting the Supreme Court from a Progressive Takeover | Roman Buhler, KeepNine.org

Jenny Beth sits down with Roman Buhler who is heading up the 'Keep Nine' initiative to prevent the progressive left from changing the number of justices and packing the Supreme Court.

Credit: Rumble     Duration: 16:12Published
BREAKING: Trump Judge Threatens Jail - Finds in Contempt [Video]

BREAKING: Trump Judge Threatens Jail - Finds in Contempt

Judge Merchan, presiding over President Donald Trump’s New York trial, ruled that the President had violated the gag order nine times and fined him for each violation – he also threatened Trump..

Credit: RumblePublished
Caught Up Ep: 7 Supreme Court oral arguments, Devolution Article 5. [Video]

Caught Up Ep: 7 Supreme Court oral arguments, Devolution Article 5.

Todays episode we will dive into the Supreme Courts Oral Arguments on Presidential Immunity. Maybe.. if there's time, Devolution Article 5.

Credit: RumblePublished