India  

Supreme Court won't study validity of corporate poll funds

IndiaTimes Tuesday, 31 October 2023
The Supreme Court of India has refused to examine the legality of corporate funding of political parties while considering the validity of electoral bonds. Petitioners argue that electoral bonds, which allow anonymous donations by big companies, give parties in power a financial advantage during elections. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing a petitioner, stated that corporate funding through electoral bonds is unrelated to the electoral process and allows parties to wield power in politics.
0
shares
ShareTweetSavePostSend
 

You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Highest court of jurisdiction in the United States

Excise policy case: 'May consider hearing Kejriwal's interim bail plea due to elections,' says SC asks ED to come prepared on May 7

Supreme Court to possibly hear Arvind Kejriwal's interim bail plea regarding Delhi elections on May 7, with the central agency possibly denying bail. Emphasis on..
IndiaTimes

‘Review bid in guise of clarification’: SC registrar junks govt plea on 2G

The registrar of the Supreme Court has declined to accept the application submitted by the Union government, which sought clarification on the 2012 judgment in..
IndiaTimes

'CBI not under control of Union of India': Centre to SC on Bengal govt's lawsuit

Supreme Court addressed Centre's objections to West Bengal's lawsuit over CBI investigations post consent withdrawal. Tushar Mehta highlighted misuse of Article..
IndiaTimes

Article 39(b) limited by laws framed by Parliament and assemblies: Centre in SC

Mehta and Dwivedi discussed legislative roles in achieving an egalitarian society by distributing material resources for common welfare, focusing on Article..
IndiaTimes

Supreme Court of India Supreme Court of India Highest judicial body in India

Supreme Court stays opening of road outside Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann's residence in Chandigarh

​​Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta observed that the road, which has been closed since the 1980s due to security concerns, has been opposed by both..
IndiaTimes

Why arrest Kejriwal right before Lok Sabha polls, SC asks ED

Supreme Court on Tuesday said Enforcement Directorate would have to give an explanation on the timing of Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest, which was carried..
IndiaTimes

'Be honest in the court': Supreme Court reprimands Uttarakhand State Licensing Authority for inaction in Patanjali misleading ad case

​​Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah's bench expressed dissatisfaction with the explanation provided by the body, noting that it seemed the..
IndiaTimes

Relief for WB mantris but SC refuses to stay HC order to sack 25,000 teachers

On Monday, the Supreme Court did not halt the Calcutta High Court's decision to invalidate the appointment of over 25,000 teachers in West Bengal. However, it..
IndiaTimes

Excise policy case: Why no bail plea in trial court, SC asks Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal

The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, heard Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Senior..
IndiaTimes

Kapil Sibal Kapil Sibal Indian lawyer and politician

Bengal trying to paint CBI probes as Centre-state row: Govt in SC

Centre informs Supreme Court of lack of control over CBI, opposing West Bengal's Article 131 suit on CBI probes. Legal battle continues with Tushar Mehta and..
IndiaTimes