When case was taken away from judge for flouting rules
Tuesday, 19 December 2023
The Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi mosque dispute took a curious turn in August when Pritinker Diwaker, the then chief justice of Allahabad high court, transferred the cases to his bench from the bench of Justice Prakash Padia. This decision was made due to concerns about the non-observance of proper procedures and the reservation of judgments. Anjuman Intezamia Masajid (AIM) and the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board approached the Supreme Court to challenge the decision, but the court declined to intervene.
The Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi mosque dispute took a curious turn in August when Pritinker Diwaker, the then chief justice of Allahabad high court, transferred the cases to his bench from the bench of Justice Prakash Padia. This decision was made due to concerns about the non-observance of proper procedures and the reservation of judgments. Anjuman Intezamia Masajid (AIM) and the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board approached the Supreme Court to challenge the decision, but the court declined to intervene.
|
||||
|
||||
π‘ newsR Knowledge: Other News MentionsSupreme Court of the United States Highest court of jurisdiction in the USSC ruling on properties puts wealth distribution debate in focus againThe Supreme Court ruled against extending the concept of 'material resources' to private assets, reigniting the debate on wealth redistribution sparked during..IndiaTimes SC: All high court judges are entitled to equal benefitsThe Supreme Court ruled that all High Court judges are entitled to equal benefits, including pensions, regardless of whether they were appointed from the..IndiaTimes 'Constitution allows minorities to build their institutions': Congress' Rashid Alvi after SC upholds UP Madrasa actThe Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Act 2004, overturning a previous Allahabad High Court decision. While..IndiaTimes State can't seize all private property for common good: Supreme CourtIn a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that states cannot seize private property for redistribution, overturning a previous socialist-leaning judgment...IndiaTimes You Might LikeRelated news from verified sources
|