Why Supreme Court's nine-judge bench needs to interpret Article 39(b)
On Tuesday, a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court initiated proceedings to interpret Article 39(b) of the Constitution. This aims to clarify whether this directive principle of state policy permits the government to manage and redistribute privately owned properties under the pretext of "material resources of the community" for the broader public welfare.
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
You Might Like💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News MentionsSupreme court Highest court in a jurisdictionVery unacceptable: SC slams IMA chief over adverse remarks on Patanjali misleading ads caseSupreme Court criticizes IMA President's remarks on Patanjali ads. Asokan expresses displeasure over court's criticism of the association and private doctors'..IndiaTimes SC allows Patanjali to file contempt plea against IMA chiefSupreme Court allows filing a contempt application against IMA chief for disparaging remarks. Mukul Rohatgi warns of serious consequences for IMA president's..IndiaTimes Sumption: Rwanda Bill breaches two international treaties Credit: ODN Duration: 01:09Published Related videos from verified sources
Related news from verified sources
|