United States: U.S. Supreme Court Ruling May Expand Employers' Exposure To Title VII Lawsuits Over Job Transfers - Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Friday, 26 April 2024 Recent years have seen multiple court rulings addressing whether certain allegedly discriminatory and retaliatory actions by employers that do not cause significant harm to the employee can nevertheless be the subject of a viable claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended.
Please join me and a group of really fantastic co-hosts this Thursday at 9:40 AM on YouTube, Rumble, and Twitter as we do livestream coverage of the oral arguments for Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court case involving the question of presidential immunity. It’s been a long and winding legal...
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments over whether the Biden administration has the power to penalize hospitals that fail to provide abortions in emergency situations. The case, Moyle v. United..
Today the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments on whether Jan. 6 protestors at the U.S. Capitol can be charged with obstructing an official proceeding. The pending ruling will impact Special..
Trump challenges Biden - House revised bill for FISA moves forward - Speaker Johnson & Trump to hold press conference at Mar a Lago - Left wing hosts and candidates sticking up for Trump now -..
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Muldrow v. St. Louis that rejected a heightened injury standard for Title VII claims based on... Mondaq
Under Title VII, a discriminatory job transfer is actionable if the transfer resulted in some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of... Mondaq
On April 12, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in favor of a landowner who asserted that legislatively imposed land use... Mondaq