India  

Border Agents Can Remove Razor Wire in Texas, Supreme Court Rules

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Duration: 01:30s - Published
Border Agents Can Remove Razor Wire in Texas, Supreme Court Rules

Border Agents Can Remove Razor Wire in Texas, Supreme Court Rules

Border Agents Can Remove Razor Wire in Texas, , Supreme Court Rules.

On Jan.

22, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 in favor of vacating last month's appeals court ruling that stopped Texas border agents from removing razor wire, 'The Hill' reports.

.

Justices that voted in favor of the decision include John Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The border conflict escalated when fences and razor wire were installed in Eagle Pass, Texas, earlier this month, 'The Hill' reports.

.

The razor wire prohibited Border Patrol officials from gaining access to the area.

.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defended the state's actions.

.

Because the facts and law side with Texas, the state will continue utilizing its constitutional authority to defend her territory, and I will continue defending those lawful efforts in court.

, Texas AG Ken Paxton, via letter to DHS general counsel Jonathan Meyer.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security should stop wasting scarce time and resources suing Texas, and start enforcing the immigration laws Congress already has on the books, Texas AG Ken Paxton, via letter to DHS general counsel Jonathan Meyer.

Paxton's response came after DHS general counsel Jonathan Meyer wrote a cease-and-desist letter.

The recent actions by the State of Texas have impeded operations of the Border Patrol.

, DHS general counsel Jonathan Meyer, via cease-and-desist letter.

Those actions conflict with the authority and duties of Border Patrol under federal law and are preempted under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

Texas’s actions also improperly seek to regulate the federal government, DHS general counsel Jonathan Meyer, via cease-and-desist letter.

Recently, a migrant woman and two children drowned while attempting to cross into Texas.

Border Patrol officials blamed the Texas National Guard for blocking them from the river and ultimately preventing them from saving the migrants, 'The Hill' reports.

While Texas officials deny the claims, the Supreme Court has intervened with its ruling.


You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Texas Texas U.S. state

Mary Jo Wright 'Miss Texas' In 'Miss Congeniality' 'Memba Her?!

American actress Deirdre Quinn was in her late 20s when she played Mary Jo Wright AKA "Miss Texas" -- the southern belle representing her home state at the Miss..
TMZ.com

US citizen arrested in America a year after UK car crash which left nurse unable to walk

A US citizen who allegedly left a British nurse temporarily unable to walk after a car crash has been arrested in Texas a year after the collision. 
Sky News

Patrick Mahomes Sr. Busted For Driving W/ Invalid License Months After DWI Arrest

Patrick Mahomes Sr. -- the father of NFL superstar Patrick Mahomes II -- has had yet another run-in with cops ... TMZ Sports has learned he was busted in Texas..
TMZ.com
Shelley Duvall, Star of 'The Shining,' Dead at 75 | THR News Video [Video]

Shelley Duvall, Star of 'The Shining,' Dead at 75 | THR News Video

Shelley Duvall, the actress known for playing Wendy Torrance in 'The Shining' and starring in numerous Robert Altman films, has died. She was 75. Dan Gilroy, Duvall's life partner since 1989, told The Hollywood Reporter she died in her sleep of complications from diabetes at her home in Blanco, Texas. He said, "My dear, sweet, wonderful life partner and friend left us. Too much suffering lately, now she’s free. Fly away, beautiful Shelley."

Credit: The Hollywood Reporter    Duration: 02:00Published

Shelley Duvall Dead at 75

Shelley Duvall, who famously co-starred in "The Shining," is dead after a painful battle with diabetes. Dan Gilroy, Shelley's life partner for decades, tells TMZ..
TMZ.com

Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Highest court of jurisdiction in the US

Big Blow to Jailed Imran Khan! Shehbaz Sharif’s Government Set to Ban ex-PM’s PTI Party [Video]

Big Blow to Jailed Imran Khan! Shehbaz Sharif’s Government Set to Ban ex-PM’s PTI Party

The Shehbaz Sharif-led government in Pakistan has decided to ban the jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, the country's Information Minister announced on Monday. The PTI is Pakistan's largest opposition party. Attaullah Tarar, the Pakistani Minister for Information and Broadcasting, announced in a press conference that the decision to ban the PTI was made due to alleged anti-state activities. The case will be referred to the Supreme Court, according to Pakistani media. #ImranKhan #PTIBan #ImranKhanPartyBan #PTIBanNews #ShehbazSharif #PakistanPolitics #PTI #PoliticalCrisis #PakistaniGovernment #ImranKhanJailed #PMLN #SupremeCourt #PoliticalTurmoil #PakistanNews #OppositionParty #PakistaniPolitics #PTIUnderFire ~HT.97~PR.152~ED.194~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:02Published

In fresh feud, Bengal moves SC against governor for stalling 8 bills

The West Bengal government, led by Mamata Banerjee, has approached the Supreme Court against Governor CV Ananda Bose for stalling eight assembly-passed bills,..
IndiaTimes

Supreme court refuses to entertain plea on protection of doctors from violence, says existing laws sufficient

The Supreme Court, led by Justice Khanna, rejected the Delhi Medical Association's plea for doctors' protection, asserting existing IPC laws suffice. Advocate..
IndiaTimes

Excise policy case: Should Arvind Kejriwal resign as Delhi CM? Here's what Supreme Court said

Kejriwal was initially arrested by the ED on March 21 in the money laundering case and then by the CBI on June 26 in the corruption case
DNA

Supreme court Supreme court Highest court in a jurisdiction

Supreme Court's Bail To Arvind Kejriwal | Key Details | What the Supreme Court Said | Watch [Video]

Supreme Court's Bail To Arvind Kejriwal | Key Details | What the Supreme Court Said | Watch

In this video, we discuss the Supreme Court's recent decision to grant bail to Arvind Kejriwal. We cover the key details of the ruling, what the Supreme Court had to say during the proceedings, and the implications of this decision for the Delhi Chief Minister and his political future. Don't miss our analysis of this significant development! #ArvindKejriwal #SupremeCourt #Bail #DelhiPolitics #Judiciary #LegalNews #PoliticalAnalysis #CurrentAffairs #IndianPolitics #Justice ~HT.97~ED.194~PR.274~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:02Published
Muslim clerics react to Supreme Court's big alimony order for Muslim women | Watch [Video]

Muslim clerics react to Supreme Court's big alimony order for Muslim women | Watch

The Supreme Court ruled Section 125 CrPC applies to all women, including divorced Muslim women. The Apex Court ruled that Muslim women can seek maintenance from husbands upon divorce. A divorced Muslim female can file a petition for maintenance from her husband, said the Supreme Court. Muslim clerics shared mixed views on the Supreme Court’s big alimony order for muslim women. One of the clerics said that SC must review its decision, while others said that this will help women. #MuslimClerics #SupremeCourt #AlimonyOrder #MuslimWomen #Reaction #LegalRuling #Judiciary #IslamicLaw #Women'sRights #India #Justice #FamilyLaw #News #Trending #WatchNow

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 09:34Published

United States Department of Homeland Security United States Department of Homeland Security United States federal department

Border Arrests Fall Over 40% Since Biden Suspended Asylum Processing [Video]

Border Arrests Fall Over 40% Since Biden Suspended Asylum Processing

Border Arrests Fall Over 40% , Since Biden Suspended Asylum Processing. The Homeland Security Department made the announcement on June 26, NPR reports. . Average daily arrests that the Border Patrol has made over a week-long period have dropped below 2,400. That is a decrease of over 40% from before the president's proclamation went into effect on June 5. That is a decrease of over 40% from before the president's proclamation went into effect on June 5. However, arrests need to drop to the 1,500 mark before asylum processing can resume. Still, the current data marks the lowest number of arrests since Jan. 17, 2021, NPR reports. . Last week, President Biden touted a 25% decrease in border arrests since the order took effect, . which means they've dropped a lot more since then. Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has called the executive order a "tremendous success.". We indeed have seen a tremendous success early on, and I should emphasize that it is early on in our implementation of the president’s proclamation and our accompanying regulation, Alejandro Mayorkas, to CNN. Mayorkas will address border enforcement efforts in Tuscon, Arizona, on June 26. The area has served as "the busiest corridor for illegal crossings" recently, NPR reports.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published

Amy Coney Barrett Amy Coney Barrett US Supreme Court justice (born 1972)

Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration in Social Media Case [Video]

Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration in Social Media Case

Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case. Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, . Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, . previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites. In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation. In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation. On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the lower court's ruling by a vote of 6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. . The plaintiffs, without any concrete link between their injuries and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion. ... ask us to conduct a review of the years-long communications between dozens of federal officials, across different agencies, with different social-media platforms, about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion. This court’s standing doctrine prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] general legal oversight’ of the other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion. Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court "glossed over complexities in the evidence" and "also erred by treating the defendants, plaintiffs and platforms each as a unified whole.". Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented. Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented. For months, high-ranking government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to suppress Americans’ free speech, Justice Samuel Alito, via dissenting opinion. The Court, however, shirks that duty and thus permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think, Justice Samuel Alito, via dissenting opinion

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published

John Roberts John Roberts Chief Justice of the United States since 2005

Supreme Court Rules That Some Jan. 6 Defendants Were Improperly Charged [Video]

Supreme Court Rules That Some Jan. 6 Defendants Were Improperly Charged

Supreme Court Rules That , Some Jan. 6 Defendants, Were Improperly Charged. NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court voted to limit which defendants accused of taking part in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot can be charged by federal prosecutors. The decision also casts doubt on two out of the four felony counts in former President Donald Trump's election subversion indictment. According to conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, the court ruled that the U.S. government must prove , “that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in an official proceeding.”. NPR reports that prosecutors relied on a key criminal statute to prosecute over 350 participants of the Capitol riot. The statute makes it a crime to alter or destroy official documents, or to otherwise obstruct or impede official proceedings. Roberts wrote that the statute was not meant to broaden the meaning of the law to make it a catchall provision. . The decision will impact other cases related to Jan. 6, many of which will have to be resentenced, retried or defendants will be released. . NYU law professor Ryan Goodman authored a study that found only 346 of the 1,417 people charged in connection with the Capitol riot were charged under the obstruction statute. The study also found that 71 people are still awaiting trial on the obstruction charge, but over half of them are also charged with another felony. NPR points out that if found guilty of other felony charges, the sentencing judge is still allowed to use the charge of obstruction to determine the length of their sentence.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Supreme Court Rules Against SEC's Authority to Impose Fines [Video]

Supreme Court Rules Against SEC's Authority to Impose Fines

Supreme Court Rules , Against SEC's Authority, to Impose Fines. NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. . NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. . Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. . Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. . The SEC relies on administrative law judges (ALJ) to make legal conclusions in cases brought before the agency. The Supreme Court's decision has the potential to send ripples through dozens of agencies, from labor rights to energy regulation. The Court did exclude from its decision those agencies dealing with federal benefits, while some conservative justices wanted the ruling to go further. The three liberal justices in dissent blasted the decision by the majority. . The case was brought by a former conservative radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, following an SEC fraud investigation. The case was brought by a former conservative radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, following an SEC fraud investigation. An in-house evidentiary hearing fined Jarkesy $300,000, ordered him to pay back almost $700,000 in ill-gotten profits and barred him from the securities industry. Jarkesy argued that he was entitled to a jury trial held in a federal court and that Congress lacked the power to delegate such authority to the SEC. NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk. NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for People Charged With Domestic Violence [Video]

Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for People Charged With Domestic Violence

Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban , for People Charged With Domestic Violence. On June 21, the Supreme Court upheld a law that keeps people with domestic violence restraining orders against them from owning firearms, NBC News reports. . The vote was 8-1. Justice Clarence Thomas was the only one who dissented. . Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the Supreme Court's majority opinion, stating that since America was founded. "our nation's firearm laws have included provisions preventing individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms.". The provision in the latest case "fits comfortably within this tradition," Roberts wrote. . Attorney General Merrick Garland applauded the ruling, . saying that it "protects victims by keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals who pose a threat to their intimate partners and children.". Erich Pratt, senior VP of Gun Owners of America, said that while the man who brought the case to the Supreme Court, Zackey Rahimi, is a "dangerous individual,". the decision "will disarm others who have never actually committed any domestic violence."

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published

Sonia Sotomayor Sonia Sotomayor US Supreme Court justice since 2009

Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s Bodyguard Shoots Alleged Carjacker Outside Home

United States Marshals guarding Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor's Washington D.C. residence shot a suspected carjacker ... and the feds say the suspect was..
TMZ.com

Related videos from verified sources

Gateway: Beyond the Headlines 1/30/24 [Video]

Gateway: Beyond the Headlines 1/30/24

Gateway: Beyond the Headlines 1/30/24 — Border convoy grows to 700,000 vehicles; Missouri AG may sue Biden; Supreme Court to hear free speech case; Musk’s Neuralink success; mysterious blob in..

Credit: RumblePublished
US District Court set to rule for Texas in razor wire case as connection to Ukraine War emerges! [Video]

US District Court set to rule for Texas in razor wire case as connection to Ukraine War emerges!

Fifth Circuit orders US District Court to hear Texas razor wire case on the merits; court expected to rule for Texas | Is there a connection between the Ukraine War and the Texas razor wire case? | Is..

Credit: RumblePublished
Did Texas Just Trigger a Civil War? [Video]

Did Texas Just Trigger a Civil War?

After the supreme court gave the Biden administration the green light to prevent border patrol from enforcing our laws, 25 states have now signaled that they support Texas' right to defend..

Credit: RumblePublished