Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for People Charged With Domestic Violence
Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Duration: 01:30s - Published
Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for People Charged With Domestic Violence
Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban , for People Charged With Domestic Violence.
On June 21, the Supreme Court upheld a law that keeps people with domestic violence restraining orders against them from owning firearms, NBC News reports.
Saying that it "protects victims by
keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals who pose a threat to their intimate partners and children.".
Erich Pratt, senior VP of Gun Owners of America, said that while the man who brought the case to the Supreme Court,
Zackey Rahimi, is a "dangerous individual,".
The decision "will disarm others who have never actually committed any domestic violence."
Speaking at the eastern zone judicial conference at National Judicial Academy, Kolkata, Justice Gavai said, "Some Judges in some HCs do not sit on time. It is.. IndiaTimes
The Supreme Court have ruled that Donald Trump has immunity for some of his actions in a case where he is charged with plotting to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss.
Credit: euronews (in English) Duration: 00:35Published
Supreme Court Sides
With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.
Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .
Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .
previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.
In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.
In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.
On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty
agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck
down the lower court's ruling by a vote of
6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .
The plaintiffs, without any
concrete link between their injuries
and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.
... ask us to conduct a review of the
years-long communications between dozens
of federal officials, across different agencies,
with different social-media platforms,
about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.
This court’s standing doctrine
prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such]
general legal oversight’ of the
other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.
Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court "glossed over complexities in the evidence" and
"also erred by treating the defendants, plaintiffs
and platforms each as a unified whole.".
Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas
and Neil Gorsuch dissented.
Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas
and Neil Gorsuch dissented.
For months, high-ranking government officials
placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to
suppress Americans’ free speech, Justice Samuel Alito, via dissenting opinion.
The Court, however, shirks that duty and thus
permits the successful campaign of coercion in
this case to stand as an attractive model for
future officials who want to control what
the people say, hear, and think, Justice Samuel Alito, via dissenting opinion
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:31Published
Supreme Court Rules That , Some Jan. 6 Defendants, Were Improperly Charged.
NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court voted to limit which defendants accused of taking part in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot can be charged by federal prosecutors.
The decision also casts doubt on two out of
the four felony counts in former President
Donald Trump's election subversion indictment.
According to conservative Chief Justice John Roberts,
the court ruled that the U.S. government must prove , “that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity
for use in an official proceeding of records, documents,
objects, or other things used in an official proceeding.”.
NPR reports that prosecutors relied
on a key criminal statute to prosecute
over 350 participants of the Capitol riot.
The statute makes it a crime to alter or
destroy official documents, or to otherwise
obstruct or impede official proceedings.
Roberts wrote that the statute was
not meant to broaden the meaning of
the law to make it a catchall provision. .
The decision will impact other cases related
to Jan. 6, many of which will have to be
resentenced, retried or defendants will be released. .
NYU law professor Ryan Goodman authored
a study that found only 346 of the 1,417 people
charged in connection with the Capitol riot
were charged under the obstruction statute.
The study also found that 71 people are still
awaiting trial on the obstruction charge, but over
half of them are also charged with another felony.
NPR points out that if found guilty of other felony charges,
the sentencing judge is still allowed to use the charge of
obstruction to determine the length of their sentence.
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:31Published
Supreme Court Rules , Against SEC's Authority, to Impose Fines.
NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court
recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and
Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. .
NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court
recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and
Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. .
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's
conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused
transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. .
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's
conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused
transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. .
The SEC relies on administrative
law judges (ALJ) to make legal conclusions
in cases brought before the agency.
The Supreme Court's decision has the potential
to send ripples through dozens of agencies,
from labor rights to energy regulation.
The Court did exclude from its decision those
agencies dealing with federal benefits, while some
conservative justices wanted the ruling to go further.
The three liberal justices
in dissent blasted the
decision by the majority. .
The case was brought by a former conservative
radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy,
following an SEC fraud investigation.
The case was brought by a former conservative
radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy,
following an SEC fraud investigation.
An in-house evidentiary hearing fined Jarkesy $300,000,
ordered him to pay back almost $700,000 in ill-gotten
profits and barred him from the securities industry.
Jarkesy argued that he was entitled to a jury trial
held in a federal court and that Congress lacked
the power to delegate such authority to the SEC.
NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported
by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk.
NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported
by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:31Published
Merrick Garland , Held in Contempt of Congress.
The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted to hold the attorney general in contempt of Congress on June 12, BBC reports.
The resolution was passed by a 216-207 vote.
Only one Republican,
David Joyce, voted in opposition. .
As a former prosecutor, I cannot in good
conscience support a resolution that
would further politicize our judicial
system to score political points, Rep. David Joyce, via statement.
Garland is held in contempt of Congress
for refusing to provide interview tapes with President Biden that were recorded during the Justice Department's classified document probe. .
Following the contempt vote, Garland said
House Republicans have "turned a serious congressional authority into a partisan weapon.".
Today’s vote disregards the
constitutional separation of powers,
the Justice Department’s need to
protect its investigations, and the
substantial amount of information we
have provided to the Committees. , Merrick Garland, via statement.
Garland is now the third U.S. attorney
general in American history to be held in contempt of Congress, BBC reports. .
In an opinion piece published in the 'Washington Post' on June 11, Garland said that "the Justice Department is under attack like never before.".
He pointed to a rise in "conspiracy theories, falsehoods, violence and threats of violence towards department officials by Republican critics.".
The short-term political benefits of
those tactics will never make up for
the long-term cost to our country. , Merrick Garland, via the 'Washington Post'
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:31Published
Biden Asserts Executive Privilege , Over Audio of Interview With Robert Hur.
In February, Hur's yearlong investigation
into whether President Biden mishandled classified documents ended without enough evidence to support criminal charges.
In February, Hur's yearlong investigation
into whether President Biden mishandled classified documents ended without enough evidence to support criminal charges.
House Republicans were provided a
transcript of Biden's interview with Hur, but they wanted the audio, which the DOJ denied.
As a result, House Republicans were
moving to hold Attorney General
Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.
On May 16, the Department of Justice told House Republicans that the president asserted executive privilege over audio from his interview with the special counsel.
The move protects Garland from criminal exposure as GOP lawmakers seek to hold him accountable.
Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte
explained the DOJ's actions in a letter.
The Attorney General must draw a line
that safeguards the Department from
improper political influence and protects
our principles, our law enforcement work,
and the people who carry out that work
independently, without fear or favor, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .
The Committees seek to hold the
Attorney General in contempt
not for failing in his duties,
but for upholding them, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .
With the information you now have,
the Committees ought not to proceed
with contempt and should instead avoid
unnecessary and unwarranted conflict, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .
White House Counsel Ed Siskel also wrote a letter supporting the assertion of executive privilege. .
The absence of a legitimate need
for the audio recordings lays bare
your likely goal—to chop them up,
distort them, and use them for
partisan political purposes, White House Counsel Ed Siskel, via letter
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:31Published
June 28, 2024 - NO Soundbites Allowed - Project 2025 what is it? Guns or fear is a public health crisis? Why is Chevron important to Supreme Court - hint, smaller Government. #2024PresidentialDebate..
The bulk of this stream will cover the FIRST Presidential Debate between Trump and the potato. We will process the debate and then head into some news topics. First on the list is the GREAT news about..
TODAY ON THE ROBERT SCOTT BELL SHOW: Supreme Court Censorship, Social Media Labels, Gun Violence Public Health Crisis, Vaccine Injury Lawsuit, ISIS Migrant Claims, Alex Newman, The New American, The..
![Biden blasts landmark Supreme Court ruling on Trump immunity [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240702/1380293022-Biden-blasts-landmark-Supreme-Court-ruling-on-Trump.jpg)
![US Supreme Court ruling a 'seldgehammer to president's accountability' [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240702/1380289654-US-Supreme-Court-ruling-seldgehammer-to-president.jpg)
![US Supreme Court rules Trump has broad immunity from prosecution [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240702/1380267966-US-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-has-broad-immunity.jpg)
![Supreme Court rules Trump has some immunity, delays trial [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240701/1380191242-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-has-some-immunity-delays.jpg)
![Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration in Social Media Case [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240626/1379711156-Supreme-Court-Sides-With-Biden-Administration-in-Social.jpg)
![Supreme Court Rules That Some Jan. 6 Defendants Were Improperly Charged [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240628/1379908144-Supreme-Court-Rules-That-Some-Jan-Defendants.jpg)
![Supreme Court Rules Against SEC's Authority to Impose Fines [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240627/1379804990-Supreme-Court-Rules-Against-SEC-Authority-to.jpg)
![Merrick Garland Held in Contempt of Congress [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240613/1378462894-Merrick-Garland-Held-in-Contempt-of-Congress.jpg)
![Biden Asserts Executive Privilege Over Audio of Interview With Robert Hur [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240516/1375637122-Biden-Asserts-Executive-Privilege-Over-Audio-of-Interview.jpg)
![Friday Roundtable: Did Biden make Dems give up? Project 2025; SCOTUS; Gun Health Crisis [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240630/1719749377-Friday-Roundtable-Did-Biden-make-Dems-give-up.jpg)
![Trump vs Biden Debate, Assange FREED, Gun Violence Crisis, Supreme Court Fail, and Tucker goes OFF [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240628/1719539288-Trump-vs-Biden-Debate-Assange-FREED-Gun-Violence.jpg)
![Supreme Court Censorship, Gun Violence Public Health Crisis, Alex Newman, The New American, Hydrophobinum - The RSB Show 6-27-24 [Video]](https://video.newsserve.net/300/v/20240627/1719515550-Supreme-Court-Censorship-Gun-Violence-Public-Health-Crisis.jpg)
