Health Freedom, RFK & Big Pharma Advertising, & Australian University Funding Cuts?

Health Freedom, RFK & Big Pharma Advertising, & Australian University Funding Cuts?

When a person is put in jail their liberty is restricted.

In that instance a person's liberty is restricted by controlling his or her ability to move their body from one place to another.

We all know that imprisoning a person cannot happen without due process and that it is a big deal under our Constitution to restrict a person's ability to move freely in the world by imprisoning them.

With that in mind, wouldn't it be an even bigger deal control what a person uses or refuses to use to treat or prevent a disease?

Wouldn't mandating a drug or vaccines be even worse than imprisoning someone?

You can let someone out of jail but you cannot take a medicine or vaccine back out of a person once they've taken it.

This is important and, in a related topic, for something as important as a drug or a vaccine shouldn't we protect people from lies and misinformation?

Well let me ask this question... who would have the greatest incentive to lie about a product?

The manufacturer or people that can choose to use it or not?

Yet we still allow big pharma to advertise with no real checks on what they say (they claim to have requirements that claims be backed by data but all the studies are created by the manufacturers).

This and lots more today.