India  

Supreme Court Throws Out New York Gun Law

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Duration: 01:30s - Published
Supreme Court Throws Out New York Gun Law

Supreme Court Throws Out New York Gun Law

Supreme Court , Throws Out , New York Gun Law.

On June 23, the U.S. Supreme Court scrapped a New York law requiring individuals to show "proper cause" in order to obtain a license to carry a firearm outside a home.

On June 23, the U.S. Supreme Court scrapped a New York law requiring individuals to show "proper cause" in order to obtain a license to carry a firearm outside a home.

'Newsweek' reports that the 100-year-old law was challenged by the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association and gun owners Brandon Koch and Robert Nash.

Koch and Nash reportedly argued that they were denied unrestricted gun licenses by the state due to allegedly failing to meet "proper cause" requirements.

All that we decide in this case is that the Second Amendment protects the right of law-abiding people to carry a gun outside the home for self-defense and that the Sullivan Law, which makes that virtually impossible for most New Yorkers, is unconstitutional, Samuel Alito, Supreme Court Justice, via 'Newsweek'.

All that we decide in this case is that the Second Amendment protects the right of law-abiding people to carry a gun outside the home for self-defense and that the Sullivan Law, which makes that virtually impossible for most New Yorkers, is unconstitutional, Samuel Alito, Supreme Court Justice, via 'Newsweek'.

Justice Stephen Breyer, who dissented from the vote, argued that the requirements for citizens to conceal-carry firearms kept people "safe.".

Justice Stephen Breyer, who dissented from the vote, argued that the requirements for citizens to conceal-carry firearms kept people "safe.".

Because I cannot agree with the Court's decision to strike New York's law down without allowing for discovery or the development of any evidentiary record, without considering the State's compelling interest in preventing gun violence and protecting the safety of its citizens, and without considering the potentially deadly consequences of its decision, I respectfully dissent, Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court Justice, via 'Newsweek'.

Because I cannot agree with the Court's decision to strike New York's law down without allowing for discovery or the development of any evidentiary record, without considering the State's compelling interest in preventing gun violence and protecting the safety of its citizens, and without considering the potentially deadly consequences of its decision, I respectfully dissent, Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court Justice, via 'Newsweek'.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul reportedly called the Court's ruling , "frightful in its scope." .

The governor added that she will also call upon the state legislature to identify "sensitive locations" to impose new restrictions


You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Highest court of jurisdiction in the US

Haridwar Mosques and Mazars Covered As Kanwariyas' Arrival Fuels Political Row Amid SC Ban| Watch [Video]

Haridwar Mosques and Mazars Covered As Kanwariyas' Arrival Fuels Political Row Amid SC Ban| Watch

Facades of two mosques and a mazar in Haridwar were covered with white cloth during the Kanwar Yatra to prevent trouble, but removed after objections. Local leaders and caretakers were unaware of the decision, which they criticized for disrupting the traditional harmony between Hindu and Muslim communities. Congress leaders condemned the action as divisive and potentially contemptuous of the Supreme Court's stance on religious identity displays. #KanwarYatra #Kanwariyas #KanwarRoute #UttarakhandGovernment #Dhami #Pushkarsinghdhami #Congress #Muslims #Mosques #Indianews #Oneindia# #Oneindianews ~PR.320~ED.102~HT.334~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:03Published

Bangladesh protesters give government deadline to meet new set of demands

Protesters have set the Bangladesh government 48 hours to meet a new set of demands after the country's Supreme Court dramatically scaled back a controversial..
Sky News
Kanwar Yatra Nameplate Controversy: Shop Vendors Cheer as Nameplates Come Down | Watch [Video]

Kanwar Yatra Nameplate Controversy: Shop Vendors Cheer as Nameplates Come Down | Watch

In a recent Supreme Court ruling, the directive requiring eateries along the Kanwariya yatra route to display the names of their owners has been stayed. This decision has been met with relief and joy from shop vendors who have promptly removed their nameplates. The court's order allows businesses to only display the type of food they offer, addressing privacy and discrimination concerns. Watch the enthusiastic reactions of the vendors as they celebrate the court’s intervention. #SupremeCourt #KanwarYatraEateriesName #EateriesOwnerName #MahuaMoitraPetition #KanwariyaYatra #LegalUpdate #CivilRights #FoodRegulations #PrivacyRights #CommunalHarmony #MahuaMoitra #AkhileshYadav #Discrimination #CourtOrder #FoodSafety #LegalIntervention #UttarPradesh #Uttarakhand ~PR.152~ED.103~GR.125~HT.96~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:07Published
SC Stays Kanwariya Route Diktat: No Need To Display Owners’ Names | Mahua Moitra, Akhilesh React [Video]

SC Stays Kanwariya Route Diktat: No Need To Display Owners’ Names | Mahua Moitra, Akhilesh React

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has stayed the directives requiring eateries on the Kanwar yatra route to display owners' names, stating they only need to indicate the type of food served. The decision came after petitions from various parties, including political commentator Apoorvanand, activist Aakar Patel, and TMC MP Mahua Moitra. The court's intervention alleviates concerns over potential communal and privacy issues. Mahua Moitra and Akhilesh Yadav have reacted to the decision, highlighting its importance for protecting civil liberties and preventing discrimination. #SupremeCourt #KanwarYatraEateriesName #EateriesOwnerName #MahuaMoitraPetition #KanwariyaYatra #LegalUpdate #CivilRights #FoodRegulations #PrivacyRights #CommunalHarmony #MahuaMoitra #AkhileshYadav #Discrimination #CourtOrder #FoodSafety #LegalIntervention #UttarPradesh #Uttarakhand ~PR.152~HT.318~GR.121~ED.141~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 06:17Published
Bangladesh Violent Protest: Supreme Court Scales Back Job Quota That Sparked Deadly Violence [Video]

Bangladesh Violent Protest: Supreme Court Scales Back Job Quota That Sparked Deadly Violence

Bangladesh’s Supreme Court has ordered a significant reduction in the country’s controversial quota system for government jobs, following nationwide protests and violent clashes that have resulted in numerous casualties. The new ruling stipulates that 93% of government jobs will now be allocated based on merit, with the remaining 7% reserved for relatives of veterans from Bangladesh’s 1971 war of independence and other specific categories. Previously, 30% of these jobs were reserved for war veterans' relatives. #BangladeshProtests #StudentUnrest #DhakaLockdown #QuotaReform #BangladeshProtestsLIVE #BangladeshProtestsViolent #BangladeshJobQuota #BangladeshSupremeCourt #SheikhHasina #BangladeshProtestNews #BangladeshNews ~HT.97~PR.152~ED.194~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:22Published

New York (state) New York (state) U.S. state

Donald Trump Winning at Polls in the Hamptons, But Only in Cup Sales

Donald Trump's securing the 'W' over President Biden in at least one arena, months ahead of the election ... but hold your horses, it's a bit of a plastic..
TMZ.com
Justin Timberlake Arrested on DWI Charge in the Hamptons | THR News Video [Video]

Justin Timberlake Arrested on DWI Charge in the Hamptons | THR News Video

Justin Timberlake has been arrested. According to ABC News and CNN the pop singer has been arrested by local police in Sag Harbor, New York for allegedly driving while intoxicated. The arrest in the Hamptons took place on Monday night and Timberlake is expected to make a court appearance on Tuesday facing a DWI charge. The incident comes a day after the singer posted a sweet Father's Day message on his Instagram.

Credit: The Hollywood Reporter    Duration: 01:10Published
Justin Timberlake Arrested in New York [Video]

Justin Timberlake Arrested in New York

Justin Timberlake Arrested , in New York. TMZ reports that Timberlake was arrested on DWI charges in the Hamptons on June 18. . Sources say he was partying at the American Hotel before getting behind the wheel. He reportedly blew a stop sign in front of police, so they began to follow him. The police say Timberlake's car was swerving, so they pulled him over. A field sobriety test was conducted, which Timberlake reportedly failed. . He refused to take a breathalyzer test, sources say. . Timberlake was later "arraigned and released without bail," TMZ reports. . His next court date is scheduled for July 26. Timberlake is currently on tour. His next shows are scheduled for June 21 and June 22 in Chicago

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published
Pitch Battle EP 2: Hardik Pandya, Rishabh Pant The X Factors For India T20 WC - Post-Match Analysis [Video]

Pitch Battle EP 2: Hardik Pandya, Rishabh Pant The X Factors For India T20 WC - Post-Match Analysis

Join our sports specialists as they dissect Rishabh Pant's audacious reverse scoop for six against Ireland's Barry McCarthy, reminiscent of his unforgettable Stroke against England's James Anderson. Explore Pant's and Hardik Pandya's stellar performances in India's commanding victory over Ireland at New York’s Nassau County International Stadium to kick off their 2024 T20 World Cup campaign. #IndiavsIreland #IndiaIreland #IndiavsIrelandMatch #IndiaIrelandMatch #India #Ireland #T20WorldCup #T20WorldCup2024 #HardikPandya #RishabhPant ~HT.178~PR.274~ED.100~GR.125~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 39:06Published

New York City New York City Most populous city in the United States

Armie Hammer's Mom Says He Was Not Criminally Wrong But Morally Wrong

Armie Hammer's mother is coming to his defense as he denies the cannibalism allegations ... and while she too insists her son never did anything illegal, she..
TMZ.com

Jennifer Lopez Hits NYC After Birthday Week in the Hamptons, Still Wearing Ring

Jennifer Lopez is back in her native city after her extended birthday Hamptons trip -- and while there's still no Ben Affleck in sight ... there is a remnant of..
TMZ.com

Cardi B Trashes Popeyes Flavored Wings, Popeyes Welcomes Criticism

Cardi B is NOT a fan of some new flavored chicken wings at Popeyes ... but the restaurant is welcoming her poor review, and encouraging her to taste other..
TMZ.com

Ryan Reynolds Reveals Name of Fourth Child at Deadpool Premiere

Ryan Reynolds celebrated the NYC premiere of his new movie "Deadpool & Wolverine" Monday night – and he also broke some pretty big news! The actor hit the..
TMZ.com

What's The Big Frigin' Difference?!

"But first, let me take a selfie" ... at least that's Penn Badgley's MO! Find your best lighting and see if you can pick up the sneaky switcharoos in these two..
TMZ.com

Samuel Alito Samuel Alito US Supreme Court justice since 2006 (born 1950)

Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration in Social Media Case [Video]

Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration in Social Media Case

Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case. Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, . Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, . previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites. In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation. In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation. On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the lower court's ruling by a vote of 6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. . The plaintiffs, without any concrete link between their injuries and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion. ... ask us to conduct a review of the years-long communications between dozens of federal officials, across different agencies, with different social-media platforms, about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion. This court’s standing doctrine prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] general legal oversight’ of the other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion. Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court "glossed over complexities in the evidence" and "also erred by treating the defendants, plaintiffs and platforms each as a unified whole.". Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented. Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented. For months, high-ranking government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to suppress Americans’ free speech, Justice Samuel Alito, via dissenting opinion. The Court, however, shirks that duty and thus permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think, Justice Samuel Alito, via dissenting opinion

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Tax Law on Foreign Investments [Video]

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Tax Law on Foreign Investments

Supreme Court Rejects , Challenge to Tax Law on, Foreign Investments. On June 20, the Supreme Court upheld a tax on foreign corporate investments enacted by a Republican-controlled Congress under former President Donald Trump. On June 20, the Supreme Court upheld a tax on foreign corporate investments enacted by a Republican-controlled Congress under former President Donald Trump. NBC reports that the case had attracted scrutiny when conservative Justice Samuel Alito refused to recuse himself despite ties with one of the challenging lawyers. The case revolved around whether an individual can be forced to pay taxes on investments in foreign-owned companies regardless of if they were a source of income. The case revolved around whether an individual can be forced to pay taxes on investments in foreign-owned companies regardless of if they were a source of income. According to the 16th Amendment of the Constitution, Congress has the power to "collect taxes on incomes.". In the case, Charles and Kathleen Moore claim they were unfairly taxed on their $40,000 investment in an India-based company called KisanKraft Machine Tools. . While the company made a profit, the Moores claim that they received no dividends and that the money was reinvested in the business. As a result, the Moores did not pay taxes between 2006 and 2017 on what the U.S. government later defined as income from their investment. . Due to a provision that was part of a major tax law enacted by former President Donald Trump in 2017, the Moores paid $15,000 in additional taxes. They later sought a refund for that payment, arguing that they had been unlawfully taxed based on an increase in the value of a capital investment not qualifying as income. The couple's challenge was rejected by the Supreme Court 7-2

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published

Related news from verified sources

Supreme Court strikes New York gun law in major ruling


Indian Express - Published

New York state law limiting gun-carrying in public gets struck down by US Supreme Court

The State of New York makes it a crime to possess a firearm without a license, whether inside or...
DNA - Published


Related videos from verified sources

Biden Endorses Ending Senate Filibuster to Codify Reproductive Rights [Video]

Biden Endorses Ending Senate Filibuster to Codify Reproductive Rights

Biden Endorses Ending Senate Filibuster, to Codify Reproductive Rights. President Joe Biden made the comment during a press conference in Madrid on June 30. He referred to the recent Supreme Court..

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories     Duration: 01:31Published
Charlamagne tha God Rips Into Dems & Says What Few Will Say Out Loud | Direct Message | Rubin Report [Video]

Charlamagne tha God Rips Into Dems & Says What Few Will Say Out Loud | Direct Message | Rubin Report

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks about Charlamagne tha God blaming Democrats for the restriction of abortion rights, “The View’s” hosts losing their minds over Roe v. Wade, Stacy Abrams..

Credit: Rumble     Duration: 00:57Published
Big Week for Gun Rights with Great Lakes Gun Rights' Brenden Boudreau [Video]

Big Week for Gun Rights with Great Lakes Gun Rights' Brenden Boudreau

Join us to discuss the Supreme Court decision overturning New York's ban on carrying in public, the betrayal by Senate (and House) Republicans that enacted the worst deprivation of gun rights..

Credit: Rumble     Duration: 00:05Published