India  

Chief Justice Roberts Comments on Orders to Build Fence Around Supreme Court

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Duration: 01:31s - Published
Chief Justice Roberts Comments on Orders to Build Fence Around Supreme Court

Chief Justice Roberts Comments on Orders to Build Fence Around Supreme Court

Chief Justice Roberts Comments on , Orders to Build Fence , Around US Supreme Court.

Chief Justice Roberts Comments on , Orders to Build Fence , Around US Supreme Court.

Chief Justice John Roberts made the comments to members of the American Law Institute.

He stated that the decision to erect a fence around the Supreme Court was the most difficult of his 20-year career as Chief Justice.

The hardest decision I had to make was whether to erect fences and barricades around the Supreme Court.

, Chief Justice John Roberts, US Supreme Court, via NBC News.

I had no choice but to go ahead and do it, Chief Justice John Roberts, US Supreme Court, via NBC News.

The fence was put in place in May 2022.

.

It went up following the leak of the decision to overturn Roe v.

Wade.

The 1973 ruling established reproductive rights for women.

Since the ruling to overturn Roe went public, the Court has faced a litany of controversies.

Reports that Clarence Thomas has accompanied powerful conservative donors on lavish vacations have raised questions about the Court's integrity.

.

Roberts addressed these questions during his remarks, as well.

I want to assure people I am committed to making certain that we as a court adhere to the highest standards of conduct.

, Chief Justice John Roberts, US Supreme Court, via NBC News.

We are continuing to look at things we can do to give practical effect to that commitment, Chief Justice John Roberts, US Supreme Court, via NBC News.

Roberts also downplayed reports of tension among the other justices.

He stated that “there has never been a voice raised in anger” even out of the public eye


You Might Like


đź’ˇ newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

John Roberts John Roberts Chief Justice of the United States since 2005

Supreme Court Rules That Some Jan. 6 Defendants Were Improperly Charged [Video]

Supreme Court Rules That Some Jan. 6 Defendants Were Improperly Charged

Supreme Court Rules That , Some Jan. 6 Defendants, Were Improperly Charged. NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court voted to limit which defendants accused of taking part in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot can be charged by federal prosecutors. The decision also casts doubt on two out of the four felony counts in former President Donald Trump's election subversion indictment. According to conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, the court ruled that the U.S. government must prove , “that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in an official proceeding.”. NPR reports that prosecutors relied on a key criminal statute to prosecute over 350 participants of the Capitol riot. The statute makes it a crime to alter or destroy official documents, or to otherwise obstruct or impede official proceedings. Roberts wrote that the statute was not meant to broaden the meaning of the law to make it a catchall provision. . The decision will impact other cases related to Jan. 6, many of which will have to be resentenced, retried or defendants will be released. . NYU law professor Ryan Goodman authored a study that found only 346 of the 1,417 people charged in connection with the Capitol riot were charged under the obstruction statute. The study also found that 71 people are still awaiting trial on the obstruction charge, but over half of them are also charged with another felony. NPR points out that if found guilty of other felony charges, the sentencing judge is still allowed to use the charge of obstruction to determine the length of their sentence.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Supreme Court Rules Against SEC's Authority to Impose Fines [Video]

Supreme Court Rules Against SEC's Authority to Impose Fines

Supreme Court Rules , Against SEC's Authority, to Impose Fines. NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. . NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. . Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. . Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. . The SEC relies on administrative law judges (ALJ) to make legal conclusions in cases brought before the agency. The Supreme Court's decision has the potential to send ripples through dozens of agencies, from labor rights to energy regulation. The Court did exclude from its decision those agencies dealing with federal benefits, while some conservative justices wanted the ruling to go further. The three liberal justices in dissent blasted the decision by the majority. . The case was brought by a former conservative radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, following an SEC fraud investigation. The case was brought by a former conservative radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, following an SEC fraud investigation. An in-house evidentiary hearing fined Jarkesy $300,000, ordered him to pay back almost $700,000 in ill-gotten profits and barred him from the securities industry. Jarkesy argued that he was entitled to a jury trial held in a federal court and that Congress lacked the power to delegate such authority to the SEC. NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk. NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for People Charged With Domestic Violence [Video]

Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban for People Charged With Domestic Violence

Supreme Court Upholds Gun Ban , for People Charged With Domestic Violence. On June 21, the Supreme Court upheld a law that keeps people with domestic violence restraining orders against them from owning firearms, NBC News reports. . The vote was 8-1. Justice Clarence Thomas was the only one who dissented. . Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the Supreme Court's majority opinion, stating that since America was founded. "our nation's firearm laws have included provisions preventing individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms.". The provision in the latest case "fits comfortably within this tradition," Roberts wrote. . Attorney General Merrick Garland applauded the ruling, . saying that it "protects victims by keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals who pose a threat to their intimate partners and children.". Erich Pratt, senior VP of Gun Owners of America, said that while the man who brought the case to the Supreme Court, Zackey Rahimi, is a "dangerous individual,". the decision "will disarm others who have never actually committed any domestic violence."

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published

Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Highest court of jurisdiction in the US

Haridwar Mosques and Mazars Covered As Kanwariyas' Arrival Fuels Political Row Amid SC Ban| Watch [Video]

Haridwar Mosques and Mazars Covered As Kanwariyas' Arrival Fuels Political Row Amid SC Ban| Watch

Facades of two mosques and a mazar in Haridwar were covered with white cloth during the Kanwar Yatra to prevent trouble, but removed after objections. Local leaders and caretakers were unaware of the decision, which they criticized for disrupting the traditional harmony between Hindu and Muslim communities. Congress leaders condemned the action as divisive and potentially contemptuous of the Supreme Court's stance on religious identity displays. #KanwarYatra #Kanwariyas #KanwarRoute #UttarakhandGovernment #Dhami #Pushkarsinghdhami #Congress #Muslims #Mosques #Indianews #Oneindia# #Oneindianews ~PR.320~ED.102~HT.334~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:03Published

Bangladesh protesters give government deadline to meet new set of demands

Protesters have set the Bangladesh government 48 hours to meet a new set of demands after the country's Supreme Court dramatically scaled back a controversial..
Sky News
Kanwar Yatra Nameplate Controversy: Shop Vendors Cheer as Nameplates Come Down | Watch [Video]

Kanwar Yatra Nameplate Controversy: Shop Vendors Cheer as Nameplates Come Down | Watch

In a recent Supreme Court ruling, the directive requiring eateries along the Kanwariya yatra route to display the names of their owners has been stayed. This decision has been met with relief and joy from shop vendors who have promptly removed their nameplates. The court's order allows businesses to only display the type of food they offer, addressing privacy and discrimination concerns. Watch the enthusiastic reactions of the vendors as they celebrate the court’s intervention. #SupremeCourt #KanwarYatraEateriesName #EateriesOwnerName #MahuaMoitraPetition #KanwariyaYatra #LegalUpdate #CivilRights #FoodRegulations #PrivacyRights #CommunalHarmony #MahuaMoitra #AkhileshYadav #Discrimination #CourtOrder #FoodSafety #LegalIntervention #UttarPradesh #Uttarakhand ~PR.152~ED.103~GR.125~HT.96~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:07Published
SC Stays Kanwariya Route Diktat: No Need To Display Owners’ Names | Mahua Moitra, Akhilesh React [Video]

SC Stays Kanwariya Route Diktat: No Need To Display Owners’ Names | Mahua Moitra, Akhilesh React

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has stayed the directives requiring eateries on the Kanwar yatra route to display owners' names, stating they only need to indicate the type of food served. The decision came after petitions from various parties, including political commentator Apoorvanand, activist Aakar Patel, and TMC MP Mahua Moitra. The court's intervention alleviates concerns over potential communal and privacy issues. Mahua Moitra and Akhilesh Yadav have reacted to the decision, highlighting its importance for protecting civil liberties and preventing discrimination. #SupremeCourt #KanwarYatraEateriesName #EateriesOwnerName #MahuaMoitraPetition #KanwariyaYatra #LegalUpdate #CivilRights #FoodRegulations #PrivacyRights #CommunalHarmony #MahuaMoitra #AkhileshYadav #Discrimination #CourtOrder #FoodSafety #LegalIntervention #UttarPradesh #Uttarakhand ~PR.152~HT.318~GR.121~ED.141~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 06:17Published
Bangladesh Violent Protest: Supreme Court Scales Back Job Quota That Sparked Deadly Violence [Video]

Bangladesh Violent Protest: Supreme Court Scales Back Job Quota That Sparked Deadly Violence

Bangladesh’s Supreme Court has ordered a significant reduction in the country’s controversial quota system for government jobs, following nationwide protests and violent clashes that have resulted in numerous casualties. The new ruling stipulates that 93% of government jobs will now be allocated based on merit, with the remaining 7% reserved for relatives of veterans from Bangladesh’s 1971 war of independence and other specific categories. Previously, 30% of these jobs were reserved for war veterans' relatives. #BangladeshProtests #StudentUnrest #DhakaLockdown #QuotaReform #BangladeshProtestsLIVE #BangladeshProtestsViolent #BangladeshJobQuota #BangladeshSupremeCourt #SheikhHasina #BangladeshProtestNews #BangladeshNews ~HT.97~PR.152~ED.194~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 03:22Published

Roe v. Wade 1973 US Supreme Court decision on abortion

WATCH: Protesters rally for abortion rights in Los Angeles [Video]

WATCH: Protesters rally for abortion rights in Los Angeles

Demonstrators supporting abortion and women's rights gathered at Los Angeles City Hall on the second anniversary of the ruling overturning Roe v. Wade.

Credit: euronews (in English)    Duration: 01:00Published
Supreme Court Upholds FDA Regulation on Popular Abortion Drug Mifepristone [Video]

Supreme Court Upholds FDA Regulation on Popular Abortion Drug Mifepristone

Supreme Court Upholds , FDA Regulation on Popular , Abortion Drug Mifepristone. On June 13, the Supreme Court ruled against a group of doctors who challenged the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) regulations on the abortion pill mifepristone. CBS reports that the case once again highlighted abortion access following the conservative majority decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022. The court ruled unanimously that the group of anti-abortion rights doctors and medical associations lacked the legal right to challenge the FDA. . However, the court also did not address whether the FDA's decision to relax the rules for mifepristone's use were lawful. . The latest ruling was authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. . Under Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff's desire to make a drug less available for others does not establish standing to sue. , Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing for the court, via CBS. Nor do the plaintiffs' other standing theories suffice. Therefore, the plaintiffs lack standing to challenge FDA's actions, Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing for the court, via CBS. CBS reports that the ruling does not impact other challenges to the FDA's standing on mifepristone, while preserving access to the popular abortion medication. In 2016 and 2021, the FDA took steps to widen access to mifepristone, which has been taken by over 5 million patients since first being approved in 2000. Those steps included allowing the drug to be taken up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy, reducing the number of in-person doctor visits and permitting it to be sold through the mail.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published

Related videos from verified sources

Meta Facing Massive Fine For Breaching EU's Data Protection Regulation [Video]

Meta Facing Massive Fine For Breaching EU's Data Protection Regulation

Meta Facing Massive Fine , For Breaching EU's , Data Protection Regulation. NBC reports that Meta has been hit with a $1.3 billion fine by privacy regulators in the European Union over the transfer..

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories     Duration: 01:29Published
Incitement Of Violence: Ocasio-Cortez Calls For Regulating Conservative News [Video]

Incitement Of Violence: Ocasio-Cortez Calls For Regulating Conservative News

Chief Justice John Roberts turned down an invitation from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin to testify about ethical issues plaguing the U.S. Supreme Court. In response, lawmakers like..

Credit: Rumble     Duration: 07:47Published