Aggressively probing attack on Indian consulate in San Francisco consulate: FBI tells NIA

Trump's Murder Bid: How Far Sniper Was, Which Weapon Used | Most Shocking Details Out

The FBI has identified the person who fired shots at former US President Donald Trump during his rally in Pennsylvania on Saturday. The suspect has been identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks. The FBI confirmed that the Republican who shot Trump used an AR-15. The US Secret Service is now investigating how a person with an AR-15 rifle entered the scene and was able to fire multiple shots. Former President Donald Trump was swarmed by Secret Service agents and rushed off the stage after the gunman opened fire at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania The shooter fired as many as eight rounds from an AR-style rifle while perched on a rooftop adjacent to the venue and was 200-300 yards away at the time of the shooting, law enforcement sources told ABC News. #DonaldTrump #TrumpWeapon #AR15 #USGunLaws #USSecurityService #SecurityServiceChief #KimberlyCheatle #TrumpAssassinationAttempt #TrumpShot #DonaldTrumpShot #DonaldTrumpAssassination #AssassinationDonaldTrump #DonaldTrumpShotCampaign #DonaldTrumpEar #DonaldTrumpBullet #USNews #BreakingNews #InternationalNews #DonaldTrumpAssassination #Biden #Trump #PoliticalViolence #NationalUnity #USPresident #BreakingNews #RehobothBeach #DonaldTrump #SecretService #StateAgencies

Trump Shooting LIVE: FBI Gives New Shocking Update On Donald Trump Rally Shooter's Motive

Donald Trump Shooting News Live Updates: The Federal Bureau of Investigation has identified 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks as the "subject involved" in the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, it said in a statement on Sunday. Watch #DonaldTrump #TrumpAssassinationAttempt #TrumpShot #DonaldTrumpShot #DonaldTrumpAssassination #AssassinationDonaldTrump #DonaldTrumpShotCampaign #DonaldTrumpEar #DonaldTrumpBullet #DonaldTrumpAttackedNews #DonaldTrumpAssassinationNews #USNews #BreakingNews #InternationalNews #DonaldTrumpAssassination #Biden #Trump #PoliticalViolence #NationalUnity #USPresident #BreakingNews #RehobothBeach #DonaldTrump #SecretService #StateAgencies

US Water System May Be Vulnerable to Cyberattack by China, Russia and Iran

US Water System May Be , Vulnerable to Cyberattack, by China, Russia and Iran. CNBC reports that the United States water system has been the target of a series of cyberattacks over the past few years. . In response, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been forced to issue an alert warning that 70% of water systems do not comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act. According to the EPA, some have “alarming cybersecurity vulnerabilities,” including unchanged default passwords and former employees who retain access to vital systems. In February, the FBI issued a warning to Congress that Chinese hackers have embedded themselves into the U.S. cyber infrastructure. . Those hackers have targeted water treatment plants, the electrical grid, transportation systems and other vital infrastructure. Those hackers have targeted water treatment plants, the electrical grid, transportation systems and other vital infrastructure. Water is among the least mature in terms of security, Adam Isles, head of cybersecurity practice for Chertoff Group, via CNBC. Stuart Madnick, an MIT professor of engineering systems and co-founder of Cybersecurity at MIT Sloan, warns that an attack that shuts off water to the population is the main concern. We have demonstrated in our lab how operations, such as a water plant, could be shut down not just for hours or days, but for weeks, Adam Isles, head of cybersecurity practice for Chertoff Group, via CNBC. Recently, EPA Administrator Michael Regan and National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan sent a letter to governors stressing the urgency of the threat. . Recently, EPA Administrator Michael Regan and National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan sent a letter to governors stressing the urgency of the threat. . CNBC reports that budgets, outdated infrastructure and an overall reluctance to take action may prevent necessary fixes from being made before a serious attack.

California firefighters battle wind-driven wildfire east of San Francisco

EPA's New Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water Could Be Upended by the Supreme Court

EPA's New Limits on PFAS , in Drinking Water Could Be , Upended by the Supreme Court. 'Newsweek' reports that the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a case against new water rules put in place by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 'Newsweek' reports that the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a case against new water rules put in place by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In April, new national limits were placed on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the nation's drinking water, otherwise known as PFAS. . Also known as "forever chemicals," PFAS have been linked to a number of health concerns, including cancer. According to the EPA, of the 66,000 public drinking water systems impacted by the new limits, an estimated 6% to 10% will need to make updates to meet the new standards. According to San Francisco, the EPA's new "narrative" regulations fail to meet the Clean Water Act's requirement to lay out clear restrictions. The lawsuit headed to the Supreme Court accuses the EPA of setting vague rules without quantifiable standards. Rather than specify pollutant limits that tell the permitholder how much they need to control their discharges as required by the CWA, these prohibitions effectively tell permitholders nothing more than not to cause 'too much' pollution, Lawyers representing San Francisco, via 'Newsweek'. These generic water quality terms expose San Francisco and numerous permitholders nationwide to enforcement actions while failing to tell them how much they need to limit or treat their discharges to comply with the Act, Lawyers representing San Francisco, via 'Newsweek'. We simply want to know in advance what requirements apply to us, and we want the EPA to fulfil its duty under the Clean Water Act to determine those requirements. , Lawyers representing San Francisco, via 'Newsweek'. 'Newsweek' points out that the Supreme Court has sided against the EPA in the past, most recently in 2022 when it ruled 6-3 against the Biden administration's climate agenda. . 'Newsweek' points out that the Supreme Court has sided against the EPA in the past, most recently in 2022 when it ruled 6-3 against the Biden administration's climate agenda.