Gujarat "fake" encounters: Petitioners have to give reasons for "selective public interest", state tells Supreme Court
Thursday, 18 January 2024 The Gujarat government questioned the petitioners' selective public interest in seeking a probe into alleged fake encounters in the state from 2002 to 2006 and asked for an explanation. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argues that encounters have occurred in other states as well. The apex court had earlier appointed a monitoring authority headed by former top court judge Justice H S Bedi which had probed 17 alleged fake encounter cases in Gujarat from 2002 to 2006.
Supreme Court Rejects , Chance to Step Into the Fight Over , Transgender Student Rights.
On January 16, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal by
the Indiana public school district, declining to intervene
in the debate over bathrooms for transgender students.
On January 16, the Supreme Court...
Fifth Circuit orders US District Court to hear Texas razor wire case on the merits; court expected to rule for Texas | Is there a connection between the Ukraine War and the Texas razor wire case? | Is..
Join the conspiracy every M-F at 6 PM eastern! Tonight, we take a look at the NH primary from INSIDE the "Granite State", we study the new Canadian court finding that Trudeau broke..
Border Agents Can
Remove Razor Wire in Texas, , Supreme Court Rules.
On Jan. 22, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 in favor of vacating last month's appeals court ruling that stopped Texas border agents..
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:30Published